u/Active-Car864

The Blake Lively clause which has become indispensable and unwaivable

This is a warning to Hollywood:

All agents
All studios
All insurance contracts
All actors
All people affiliated, contracted and collaborating on any movie

Should have a termination for Blake Lively and/or Ryan Reynolds in their contracts.

That is that if at some point in the project or in the movie or in the promotional activities, those two are involved they are entitled to:
1)immediate termination
2) payment of all contractually agreed payments
3) payment of all expenses incurred and reputational damages of no less than 300 m$ for being associated in any shape or form with these two.
4) relieved of all contractual obligations

That is what I would do.

reddit.com
u/Active-Car864 — 2 days ago

A normal, ambitious and devious actress or actor, planning to steal a movie would have done the following:
1)Not signed the contract to have leverage

2)demanded to have the dailies

3)extorted days in the edit room

4)blackmailed Sony to chose her/his cut

5)insisted to have her/his name credited as producer

6)promoted the movie according to the studio's marketing plan and the movie theme for maximum success

7)held a lot of interviews boasting about having been the architect of the movie with regard to artistic choices, production and script...

What a psychopath would do:
1)turn the cast against the director and the owner. It is called triangulation.

2)Create a 17 point letter out of unrelated and insignificant facts to engage in extortion

  1. Assemble and grow an army of flying monkeys and devise stories with them in support of one's own fictitious victimhood: Isabella Ferrer and her mole, Jenny Slate and her 15.000 apartment down payment and sexy pants...

4)Order the director of the movie to my palace to have my unhinged equally psychopathic humiliate, berate and yell at him in front of my A-list friends

5)Fabricate an SH claim against the Director and file it, requiring it not be investigated...

6)Collude with my other A-List friend and use her connections at the NYT, who have gained prominence through the #MeToo movement to lend a seal of veracity to my entirely fabricated SH claim.

  1. Create a John Doe lawsuit with fallacious circumstances to abuse court proceedings to whitewash illegally obtained evidence, which is only evidence to the extent that It still needs doctoring to qualify as such

8)Subpoena 107 content creators, some with less as 200 followers through the social media companies so as to limit their rights to oppose, to bankrupt and scare them into not covering my misdeeds and withdrawing the subpoenas as soon as their lawyers or the judge gets involved...

  1. Filing a lawsuit with my enhanced lies and when the proof that I lied is provided, I amend my complaint.

10)Flood the zone with PR pieces such as fake awards, fake stories about my mother being assaulted, me baking hair cookies, taking my kids to PG rated shows, my husband making ridiculously low sum donations (compared to his net wealth) always to children organisations and always when the SEO requires it

11)Blackmail my so called best friend with regard to 10 years of texts which I am ready to release, if she doesn't support me in my made-up SH crusade...

  1. Finally, say that the "SH" claim was never the issue but rather the be "retaliation", hence diminishing the crime of SH, blabbing about "digital violence", which I myself weaponise in the extreme and now claiming to be a victim soldier for guess whom? "The children", you guessed it.

A psychopath who did not understand what DV meant, would not understand what SH meant, would understand what digital violence and retaliation are because she and her husband are experts in the latter, while probably exercise the earlier without even noticing.

I want them banned, poor and punished with prison time.

Of course this is my opinion based on my observations. I am not a clinician but a "normal" person.

reddit.com
u/Active-Car864 — 12 days ago