I have logical and moral issues with fully embracing Christianity
As the title suggests- I have deeply logical and moral issues fully embracing Christianity as the truth.
For background- I am a 34 yr old man born and raised in the USA but have lived in Canada now for 13 years.
I grew up in a moderately Christian household and in my preteen and early teen years I was deeply firm in my Christianity up until the age 15 and even attended a Christian private school from age 11-14 (I also attended a private Christian preschool as well). So Christianity was a decent sized part of my upbringing. At age 15 I was in limbo and felt put off by the judgement and hypocrisy I witnessed at the Christian school I was attending and began to seek what else was out there. By 16 I was a hardcore atheist and remained that way until about 25 from which I was more or less an atheist leaning agnostic until about age 29-30 at which point I began questioning what else is there to this life and is there anything after. I felt like there must be but was still put off from organized religion. Age 31-33 I on and off tried to bring myself to calling myself a Universalist open minded Christian (and I still wish I could but ill get to why I cant). As of now being 34 I think I have finally settled on calling myself a Perennialist with sympathetic leanings towards Christian Universalism and Secular Humanism both (and ideologies that share values with these 2 trains of thought, hence why I consider myself a Perennialist).
Now for me to formally address my deep issues with fully embracing Christianity that I cant seem to get any real answers for beyond "the bible says so" or "thats just how it is" or "God works in mysterious ways".
Eternal hellfire/ punishment is an atrocious school of thought. It is BOTH deeply immoral and illogical to assume eternal punishment for finite "crimes". To think a peaceful buhdist or athiest should burn in hell forever for being born in the wrong place/ not being part of the right religion while a mass murderer who converts to Christianity before dying will be in Heaven is deeply immoral and unacceptable and I dont think my mind can be changed on this. Being part of the right club or born in the right era or continent or else be tortured forever is sadistic and illogical. I will NEVER accept this but some passages in the Bible allude to it depending on how you interpret and many conservative and orthodox christians accept this. I will never consider it. I could in theory accept a place of purification and atoning for REAL crimes like murder and other serious violent offenses or as a place to educate someone on their transgressions (even if they are small like petty theft or lying etc) and to understand why what they did was wrong and to be rehabilitated for a certain amount of time depending on the transgression but thats it. Eternal damnation for not being part of the right club or born in the right place/ time ill never accept that. Period.
What constitutes as "sin/crime". I cannot accept how consensual sexual activities between 2 adults whether that be homosexuality or some form of polyamory be seen as morally wrong or worthy of punishment. This is just flat illogical and the only argument I ever hear from Christians is either "the bible says so, so its true!" or "having a family should be EVERYONES goal in any sexual or intimate relationship". I flat out reject arguments from tradition/ authority that lack substantive explanations beyond "because I say so" and I also reject the idea that EVERYONE MUST desire to have a family as the ONLY outcome of sex or intimacy. Its just not logical. Many of the greatest scientists or thinkers or artists didnt have children or get married, I dont see why they should have to choose between having a family or celibacy. Having a family or living a life of abstinence or monogamy should be a choice. The only issue surrounding sexual acts that should be considered is consent and honesty not arbitrary lines drawn in the sand on what consenting adults can or cant do in their own bedroom. One of the big differences between Judaism and Christianity is breaking away from arbitrary traditional rules that serve no practical purpose other than "this is how it is because we say so".
What happens to people who lived before Christianity or Judaism? The human species is over 200,000 years old and if you dont accept that we wont be able to have much of a debate. I trust scientists with science and philosophy/ theology with philosophers/ theologians. Surely most humans to live didnt hear of the Abrahamic faiths. Are they simply doomed to hellfire? This is deeply immoral. There are remote tribes and people in 3rd world nations living to this day who have not heard of Christianity or Judaism but otherwise live a life more or less than same as people in western nations in regards to moral values are they simply doomed to eternal suffering for being in the wrong place and being part of the wrong club?
For me to accept something it must coincide with observable reality. Im not so bothered by big things like not being able to witness a deity creating the universe or Jesus rising from the dead but things like a literal global flood is deeply unscientific as is a young earth or the denial of evolution. For me I cant simply deny science when it makes faith more complicated to accept. You have to be able to find a way to mold the faith to fit with the actual facts otherwise youre just denying reality for the sake of tradition and dogma.
I must admit also that beyond the logical and moral issues I have with confidently calling myself a Christian I am also very put off from the religion from American conservative Christians as they tend to be some of the most hostile, judgmental and backwards people I have ever encountered. Larping as crusaders and cherry picking the Bible to only keep the eternal hellfire and anti gay parts while leaving out the help your neighbors and forgiveness parts (literally the opposite way the bible should be cherry picked if youre going to cherry pick!!!).
I want to close this off with saying I dont hate Christianity, I grew up with it and still hold alot of its values closely and even very badly want to call myself a Chrisitian Universalist but I cant, I have to settle with calling myself a Perennialist because I feel like I am being more honest by doing so. I dont want to flat out lie and say that I think eternal hellfire for asinine things such as being born in the wrong place/time is ok or that sex should ONLY be between a man and a woman for the purpose of having offspring or that everyone born before christianity is doomed and all remote people of earth as well etc.
I remember visiting Japan a few years ago where most of the population is either Buhdist/ Shinto/ Atheist and it was such a clean and well mannered country. People just like you and me and living normal lives like us but they were born in a different place and culture and to me its immoral and illogical to think that is worthy of eternal torture.
***I am not interested in hearing arguments from authority/ tradition and I am also not much interested in hearing Calvinist perspectives because I find Calvinism to be elitist and disgusting thinking people are predestined for eternal hellfire.
***I AM interested in hearing open minded and honest dialogue from Christians/ theists and others interested in pursuing the topic further to maybe flesh out my issues with the faith and potentially move me closer to Christian Universalism rather than simply a Perennialist with Christian Universalist sympathies. There is virtually no chance I accept a form of Christianity that doesnt have some element of universalism as the mere idea of eternal torture is absurd.
I think the most appealing idea from Christianity that I still incorporate into my Perennialism is Apokatastasis. The idea that eventually all things in the universe will be made whole and right seems both logical and moral and bridges the gap between schools of thought like Buhdism with the idea of Nirvana etc.
Anyways, thank you for your time!