I wrote a first post about what I wish I knew before starting an MBA in NYC. A few people found it useful, so I wanted to write a more specific version on investment banking recruiting while it is still fresh in my memory.
This one is not about whether banking is good or bad. It is not about whether MBAs are worth it. It is not even about technical prep in the abstract.
This is about the actual mechanics.
Because before business school, I heard words like “corporate presentation,” “coffee chat,” “networking,” and “follow-up,” but I did not fully understand what those things meant in real life.
So let me explain what it actually feels like.
A bank comes to campus.
Let’s use Bank of America as an example. The event usually starts with a presentation. For 20 to 30 minutes, they talk about the firm, the culture, the summer associate role, the different groups, and the recruiting process. Depending on your school and the bank, there may be several bankers in the room. Some are alumni. Some are from coverage groups. Some are from product groups. Some are junior. Some are senior.
That part is straightforward.
The real part starts after the presentation ends.
Everyone stands up, and the room turns into circles.
Each banker becomes the center of a small group of students. You walk up to one of those circles, stand there, listen, wait for an opening, introduce yourself, ask a question, and try to make a decent impression without making the whole thing weird.
This is what people mean when they say “networking event.”
And honestly, it is much more awkward than it sounds.
You are standing with five to ten other people around one banker. Everyone wants to speak. Everyone wants to sound smart. Everyone wants to be remembered. But nobody wants to look desperate. So there is this strange dance where people are waiting for eye contact, waiting for pauses, trying to enter the conversation, trying to ask one clean question, and then trying to leave the circle gracefully.
Nobody really teaches you how to do that.
You need a short pitch.
Not a life story. Not a dramatic monologue. Just a clean version of who you are, what you did before business school, why banking, and why that bank or group might make sense. It should be around 30 to 45 seconds, but it should not sound like you are reciting something you memorized in the mirror.
You also need a real question.
This is where a lot of people underestimate the process. You usually do not get ten minutes with a banker at these events. Sometimes you get one question. That is it. So the question cannot be random.
“What is the mentorship like?” is not the worst question in the world, but it is usually too generic. Everyone asks some version of that. A better question shows that you know something about the bank, the group, the market, or the kind of work they do.
It does not need to be genius. It just needs to be specific.
For example, if you are speaking to someone in industrials, ask about a trend in industrial M&A. If you are speaking to someone in healthcare, ask how regulatory uncertainty is affecting deal activity. If you are speaking to someone in financial sponsors, ask how sponsors are thinking about exits or financing conditions.
The question is not just about the answer.
The question is a signal.
It tells the banker whether you prepared, whether you understand the room you are in, and whether you can have a normal professional conversation.
There is also etiquette to the circles.
Do not interrupt someone mid-question. Do not trap the banker with a three-minute question. Do not turn your question into a speech. Do not try to dominate the circle. Do not ask something just to sound smart if you cannot handle the answer. Do not visibly compete with your classmates in a way that makes everyone uncomfortable.
The best version of this is simple.
Enter the circle. Listen. Introduce yourself when there is a natural opening. Ask one thoughtful question. Let the banker answer. Maybe add one short follow-up if it feels natural. Then thank them and move on.
It sounds basic, but when you are actually in the room, it is not that basic.
After the event, the follow-up matters.
If you spoke to a banker, you should usually send a short thank-you email the next morning. Not a long essay. Not a desperate note. Two or three sentences is enough.
Something like:
“Thank you for taking the time to speak with me after the presentation yesterday. I appreciated your perspective on how the group is thinking about sponsor-backed exits in the current market. I look forward to staying in touch throughout the process.”
That is enough.
The key is to reference something specific from the conversation. If the banker gave you an answer, mention it. If they talked about their group, mention it. If they gave advice, mention it.
Do not send the same generic email to everyone.
Also, track everything.
You will think you will remember. You will not.
After a few events, every conversation starts blending together. You need a tracker with the bank, name, group, title, date met, what you discussed, whether you followed up, whether they responded, and any next step.
This is not optional if you are serious.
There may be days where you speak to six or eight bankers across different events. Then the next day, you need to send follow-ups. Then another bank comes. Then another. Then coffee chats begin. If you do not track it, your process becomes chaos very quickly.
Now coffee chats.
A coffee chat is usually around 30 minutes. It can be in person, on Zoom, or by phone. Sometimes you get one because a banker offers it after an event. Sometimes you get one because you reached out. Sometimes you get one because you were selected through the recruiting process.
The calendar part is more annoying than people admit.
A banker may ask you to send availability. You send three windows. But you do not know which one they will pick, or whether they will respond at all. Now multiply that by five bankers. Suddenly, half your week is blocked by possible coffee chats that may or may not happen.
This is where your calendar becomes Tetris.
You are trying to protect class time, attend bank events, prepare for technicals, do assignments, maintain some kind of social life, and keep open windows for bankers who may respond at random times.
My personal advice: give clean windows during normal business hours. Make it easy for them. Do not make them solve your calendar. I personally tried to avoid Fridays because Friday coffee chats never worked well for me, but that may just be my experience.
For coffee chats, you need more than your basic pitch.
You need to know your story clearly.
Why banking? Why now? Why this bank? Why this group? Why does your background make sense? What are you hoping to learn? What kinds of deals or industries interest you?
You also need to be able to talk about a deal.
Not every coffee chat becomes a deal discussion, but you should be ready. If you are talking to someone in a specific group, you should know a relevant transaction.
Know the buyer. Know the seller. Know the transaction value. Know whether it was cash, stock, or mixed consideration. Know the strategic rationale. Know what multiple was paid, if available. Know whether there were regulatory issues, activist investors, financing issues, or market concerns.
You do not need to sound like a banker already.
But you should not sound like you read the headline five minutes before the call.
Choosing the deal matters.
If you are speaking with someone at a specific bank, try to choose a deal where that bank had a real advisory role. Not a deal where the bank was barely involved. Ideally, pick something recent, meaningful, and large enough to matter. If you are speaking to a healthcare banker, pick healthcare. If you are speaking to a tech banker, pick tech. If you are speaking to an industrials banker, pick industrials.
And be careful if the banker actually worked on the deal.
That can be good, but it can also expose you quickly if you are pretending to know more than you do. A safer approach is to be curious rather than performative.
For example:
“I was reading about the transaction and thought the rationale around portfolio expansion was interesting. I was curious how bankers think about buyer motivation in a situation like that.”
That is much better than acting like you personally advised the CEO.
Another thing people do not fully understand: banks are not only evaluating whether you are smart.
They are evaluating whether you are safe.
Can this person be put in front of a client? Can this person write a clean email? Can this person listen? Can this person take feedback? Can this person be staffed on a team without making everyone’s life harder? Can this person handle pressure without becoming strange? Can this person represent the firm?
That is why small things matter.
How you enter a circle matters. How you leave a conversation matters. Whether you follow up matters. Whether your email is clean matters. Whether your story makes sense matters. Whether you ask a question that sounds prepared matters.
You may not get told when you made a mistake.
That is one of the strangest parts of the process. A bank can just stop engaging. You may never know exactly why. Maybe you were fine, but someone else was stronger. Maybe you were too generic. Maybe you seemed uninterested. Maybe you seemed too aggressive. Maybe your follow-up was sloppy. Maybe your story did not connect. Maybe nothing went wrong and there were just too many candidates.
That uncertainty is part of it.
People talk about getting “cut.” That basically means you are no longer moving forward with that bank, or you are no longer being prioritized. Sometimes it is obvious. Sometimes it is silent.
This is why consistency matters.
You do not need to be the most impressive person in every room. You need to avoid obvious mistakes and keep showing up prepared. Banking recruiting rewards people who can do the basics correctly over and over again.
Prepare before the event.
Know who is coming if the list is available. Know their group. Know what the bank has done recently. Know which two or three people you want to speak with. Have a reason for speaking with them. Have a question ready for each type of person.
Prepare after the event.
Send the follow-up. Update the tracker. Note what you discussed. Note whether there is a possible reason to reconnect.
Prepare before the coffee chat.
Review the banker’s background. Review the group. Review your story. Review one relevant deal. Prepare a few questions, but do not make the conversation feel like an interrogation.
Then after the coffee chat, follow up again.
Short. Specific. Professional.
That is the process.
It is not glamorous. It is not mysterious. It is repetitive. You show up. You talk to people. You listen. You follow up. You track. You prepare. You do it again. And again. And again.
The reason it feels overwhelming is because there are so many small steps, and each one feels like it could matter.
Nobody tells you that networking is partly logistics.
It is not just charm. It is calendar management. Email discipline. Note-taking. Remembering names. Remembering groups. Knowing when to follow up. Knowing when not to. Knowing how to be interested without being annoying.
That is the hidden work.
So if you are recruiting for investment banking, do not only ask, “Do I know the technicals?”
Ask yourself:
Can I explain my story clearly?
Can I walk into a circle and not freeze?
Can I ask one intelligent question?
Can I send a clean follow-up email?
Can I track 40 conversations without losing my mind?
Can I discuss one deal without pretending to know more than I know?
Can I be normal, prepared, and consistent for two months?
Because that is a lot of what the process is.
The technicals matter. The resume matters. The school matters. Prior experience matters. But the day-to-day process is built out of these small interactions.
That is the part I wish someone had explained to me.
Not just “network”. Play the actual game.
EDIT - P.S. One important caveat: my perspective is shaped by being in New York City, where many of the banks are already located. That is a real advantage, and I do not want to ignore it. If you are recruiting from a school outside New York, you need to factor in travel time and travel cost much more seriously than I did.
In the earlier part of the process, many conversations may happen by Zoom or phone. But as recruiting moves forward, a lot of coffee chats and later-stage interactions can become face-to-face. I met students from other schools who had traveled into New York for those conversations. For some people, that might mean a one-hour train ride. For others, it could mean flights, hotels, and losing an entire day to travel.
So if you are not already in the city where the banks are, build that into your plan. Recruiting is already a calendar-management exercise. Travel adds another layer. You may need to be more selective about which banks you prioritize, more thoughtful about batching meetings, and more realistic about how much physical presence the process may require. That was not a major issue for me, but I know it is a very real issue for others.