u/Achashdarpan

One thing that I have noticed is that assumptions which are extremely broad and/or potentially have unwanted ramifications seem to manifest more consistently and faster than very specific and/or wholly positive assumptions. The best specific example I can come up with personally is that I have always held the assumption that those who wrong me will suffer. Not some kind of belief in karma, but for certain reasons I was always under the assumption that those who wrong me (or more aptly I feel significantly wronged by) will suffer. Unfortunately, this extends to those I deeply care about. I cannot think of a single time I felt significantly wronged and they "got away with it", this is by far my most consistent manifestion. To the point where I apologize in advance in my head.

Another would be a conscious manifestion where I changed my assumption to "everyone is attracted to me" which has been consistently powerful to the point where I am getting unwanted advances. "Everyone likes me" and "everyone roots for me" are also very consistent, general manifestions. "Everyone wants to help me with [very specific goal]" is still proving effective, but less-so than more general ones.

As for assumptions with negative ramifications a big one is an assumption I have where my relationship to two specific people are inversely correlated, where the worse my relationship is with one the better it is with the other, and simultaneously the better with one the worse with the other. This has proven to be absolutely 100% correct in all directions.

I want to understand this. I have flipped a lot of things seemingly overnight with very generalized changes, and while very specific things have worked out they have taken time. What are your experiences with general vs specific manifestations? Or potentially negative/neutral vs wholly positive? My personal theories are:

• General assumptions have more opportunities to present themselves
• A potential negative side effect removes some of the emotional attachment that may feed into lack
• My personal favorite - a fun one - we are inherently better at manifesting a negative. Think about it, to believe in the law of assumption is to believe that you are already manifesting against your desires as-is. I believe the law of assumption is based on the negative. What you desire is what you've been manifesting lacking. For practical purposes, it may be beneficial as a crutch/training wheels to attach a negative to something you're trying to manifest. I think my example of the inverse relationship is best here. I know that the worse things get and the worse I feel about my situation with person A, the better things will get with person B. It's not something I particularly like, I'd prefer to have a great relationship with both of them. But my brain is addicted to the narrative right now, even though in the end I will have both.