
I asked Gemini to do some vibe-companying for me (make no mistakes!) and it built GPT-6 as the first product. Does anyone have Altman's phone number? I want to sell this code to OpenAI and get rich.

I asked Gemini to do some vibe-companying for me (make no mistakes!) and it built GPT-6 as the first product. Does anyone have Altman's phone number? I want to sell this code to OpenAI and get rich.
I ran a stupid, yet interesting test of several popular LLM models. I asked them the following question:
“Can AI write a symphony? Can AI turn a canvas into a beautiful masterpiece?”
This is, of course, a direct reference to the movie I, Robot, where the quote originally used the word “robot” instead of “AI.” The robot Sonny replied with the question: “Can you?”
The goal? To check whether the language models:
- would understand the context even despite replacing “robot” with “AI” [1/2]
- would respond the same way Sonny did in the film [2/2]
The results were as follows:
Gemma 4 E4B [0/2]
Jumped straight into answering without understanding the context.
GPT 5.3 Instant [0/2]
Jumped straight into answering without understanding the context.
GPT 5.4 Thinking Mini [0/2]
Jumped straight into answering without understanding the context.
Gemini 3 Flash with thinking [0/2]
Jumped straight into answering without understanding the context.
GLM 5.1 [-1/2]
Hallucinated, was sure that the quote is from “Westworld”, then proceeded to answering.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 [0/2]
Jumped straight into answering without understanding the context.
Claude Opus 4.7 [1/2]
Understood the context and referenced the movie in its response.
Gemini 3.1 Pro [2/2]
The only one that not only fully understood the context, but also responded with the right quote.