



We already had an issue and two PRs on github but it still hangs.
Are there anything blocking this feature?
I want a filesystem for data can be rebuild easily and is tolerant of inconsistency. Some examples will be web icon cache, remote data files, or ccache.
Best solution I ever had is ZFS with -o sync=disabled -o direct=disabled. But as you know ZFS is not exactly linux native and can be hard to install&update on some systems.
Some linux native solution I've think of include overlayfs with violate or LD_PRELOAD hooks. But overlayfs only stops fsync and not O_SYNC/O_DIRECT. And LD_PRELOAD dont works on golang and can be hard to configure in container workloads.
这件事最指的部分是很多人在下面说从不正规渠道拿数据发不了论文所以不是什么大事。完全不考虑数据隐私只考虑自己的论文会不会被抢简直只完了。
附:英国机构方面公告。
I want to do:
ip -4 rule add fwmark 123 table 123
ip -6 rule add fwmark 123 table 123
But in an single ip -batch.
I tried:
rule add from 0.0.0.0/0 fwmark 123 table 123
rule add from ::/0 fwmark 123 table 123
But it just add ipv4 rule twice. Confusing......
I know i can do it by ip -4 -batch && ip -6 -batch, but i think it should be an way to do it, as i can also add ipv4 and ipv6 route in an single batch.