u/ACDCbaguette

The art of waiting: How 15-year-old Paul McCartney made John Lennon "crave" him.
▲ 12 r/beatlescirclejerk+1 crossposts

The art of waiting: How 15-year-old Paul McCartney made John Lennon "crave" him.

https://preview.redd.it/5uy19elo9q0h1.png?width=1140&format=png&auto=webp&s=92ff5ef438ed5ecade4ceb440a851a0055b8b75f

We all know the date - July 6, 1957. Woolton, Liverpool. We’ve all read and heard about the first meeting between Paul and John, the guitar tuning, and the rock and roll chords. However, I’m thinking about the details, the spark between Paul and John, and what happened after the "Big Bang."

After that Saturday, John Lennon was definitely impressed because he had just met someone who showed a promise of competence, manners, and style. Paul arrived at the Woolton fete looking remarkably sharp in a white sports jacket with silver pinstripes and black 'drainpipe' trousers (The Beatles: All These Years,Mark Lewisohn), John's ego, however, wouldn't allow him to beg, so he sent a mediator – his friend Pete Shotton, who described everything in detail in his book John Lennon: In My Life.

And here, 15-year-old Paul McCartney made his first strategic move. When he received the invitation to join the band, he didn’t say "Yes" immediately. He said, "I'll think about it." And he left John waiting for two whole weeks. But he sent him notes with song lyrics and chords during that time.

Was Paul that busy?

No. He was weighing the positives and negatives while simultaneously giving himself weight (status). He knew that if he accepted immediately, he would just be "the boy who plays well." By imposing a two-week distance, he created a deficit. He made John "crave" him not just as a musician, but as an equal partner. Paul announced his price even before he stepped into a rehearsal.

While Paul was playing out a "diplomatic siege" for two weeks, George Harrison was the absolute opposite. His story is an example of pure, almost childish persistence. He literally chased John and Paul. Being younger (only 14), John initially perceived him as an "annoying kid."

The contrast: Paul was invited and made John wait. George was not invited – he had to prove himself.

The case of Ringo Starr is perhaps the purest manifestation of business ruthlessness by Paul and John as leaders. If Paul was the "Gray Eminence" and John was the official leader, then Ringo was the "missing piece of the machine" that they simply went and took.

Ringo was the best drummer in Liverpool, played with the most popular band (Rory Storm and the Hurricanes), had his own car, and wore a beard. He was older than them and had "status." They invited him at a time when the Beatles already had a recording contract, and Ringo agreed in seconds. He realized that his band had hit its ceiling, and the Beatles were a rocket taking off.

If Paul stood at the center of the band's management, it means he selected the "tools" for the project with extreme precision. He knew who he needed and when, how to influence whom, and skillfully assembled the puzzle with the right people at the right moment.

Why am I writing all this? Out of sincere interest. There might be minor inaccuracies, but my goal is to unravel the technical, or rather the psychological moves in the hierarchical arrangement and the creation of a global magic. Paul made the wildest boy in Liverpool wait at his gate. And John waited. Because the moment Paul finally said "Yes," he already possessed the cipher of power. I don't know if he foresaw the massive success, but as we can see, he designed it.

reddit.com
u/ACDCbaguette — 22 hours ago