I’m working on a project that models a set of interacting variables, 42 of them, as a coupled network. I’m trying to explore how changes propagate and whether meaningful emergent behavior can arise. I mostly want to see if it can feel realistic enough to display it at public events.
Each variable is represented as a node with a normalized state, and changes get directed through weighted pathways between nodes. Each connection can behave differently depending on the interaction, by using nonlinear response functions (linear, sigmoid, saturation, polynomial, etc.).
When one variable is changed, the effects 'ripple' through the network in a damped way, creating cascades that eventually settle into a new equilibrium.
The goal isn’t to predict real-world outcomes, I recognize the impossibility there, but rather it is to explore how interconnected systems behave when many variables influence each other simultaneously. I chose to use Society as the mirror because I thought it was the most intriguing.
Now, I’m trying to understand whether this type of structure is capable of producing meaningful or insightful emergent behavior, or if it risks being too arbitrary or overly dependent on chosen weights.
I’d really appreciate input on:
- Whether this kind of network structure is a reasonable way to explore complex systems
- Whether there are known frameworks or models I should study
- What pitfalls I should watch out for
There’s more detail (including math and implementation) in the repo if helpful:
https://github.com/thesoundofcolor/society-v1
(Check the whitepaper out for the overview, or just ask me anything and I'll try to respond swiftly)
I’m less concerned with being “correct” right now and more interested in understanding whether this approach is fundamentally sound or misleading.
Image of panel (rear) where I am using 5 sliders to test out hardware, instead of the total 42