u/420Monks

Busy building colors.codes, a named color library where every hex in sRGB has a real name (16,777,216 colors) and a permanent URL. Curious what reads off.

Three surfaces I'd especially like eyes on:

  • The canvas (homepage). Does the infinite scroll-zoom feel intuitive or weird? Is it smooth considering the amount of colors?
  • The Tools menu. Are the names and blurbs clear enough to pick the right one without clicking in, or do they need work?
  • Pick a tool to actually try (palette builder, image picker, gradient composer, contrast checker).

Anything else that catches your eye, fair game.

https://colors.codes

u/420Monks — 14 days ago

I made a color-palette tool (web app + Chrome extension) as a deliberately stateless product. No accounts, no sign-up, no email collection. Saved colors live in your browser's localStorage. Palettes are URLs. When you share a palette, you share a link. There's no DB row, no token, nothing that can leak after the fact. The extension parses pages locally and never phones home.

The privacy story is structural, not promised. There's nothing to breach because there's nothing stored server-side. I like it that way. Early users seem to like it that way.

But the product has obvious virality vectors. Designers share palettes. Teams converge on brand colors. Screenshots get reposted with the URL underneath. And accounts would unlock real things: sync across devices, a profile page that becomes a social surface, follow loops, a path to monetization beyond a tip jar.

So the question for people who've been at this fork: when do you switch from "the no-account thing is the product" to "accounts are how this actually grows"? Has anyone kept the stateless model and still hit real growth? If you added accounts later, was it the unlock, or did you regret losing the simplicity? Is there a middle path I'm not seeing, like anonymous-by-default with optional sync, or something cleaner?

Not looking for the obvious answer. Looking for the trap.

reddit.com
u/420Monks — 15 days ago