Hi everyone, I’m using a Lumix G85 with the 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 as my primary travel lens. While the zoom range is convenient, the small aperture is a nightmare for low-light video (too much noise) and I can't get that "cinematic" bokeh I desire.
I’m looking to add one prime lens to my kit for low-light videography, travel, and portraits of friends. I’m torn between:
- LUMIX 25mm f/1.7: It’s versatile and natural, but I’m worried it might feel too similar to the mid-range of my zoom lens during the day. Also, it lacks O.I.S. (though I have IBIS on the G85).
- LUMIX 42.5mm f/1.7: The bokeh is gorgeous and the Dual I.S. 2 support is tempting for handheld video. However, I’m worried that the 85mm equivalent focal length will be too tight for indoor restaurants or narrow streets when hanging out with friends.
My main questions:
- For low-light video, which one provides a more noticeable "cinematic" jump from the 14-140mm?
- Is the 42.5mm too restrictive for general travel and casual social gatherings?
- Or should I just stick with the 14-140mm and deal with the low light? Is a prime lens worth the extra space in my bag?
I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially if you’ve used this specific combo on a G85. Thanks!
u/21lilshit — 2 months ago